Performance pay schemes create a direct link between a teacher’s wages or bonus, and the performance of their class. A distinction can be drawn between awards, where improved performance leads to a higher permanent salary, and payment by results, where teachers get a bonus for higher test scores. These bonuses can be retrospective (payment after satisfactory pupil performance) or prospective (such as ‘loss aversion’ approaches where the bonus is given upfront, but then paid back if the results are not satisfactory). A key issue is how performance is measured and how closely this is linked to outcomes for learners.
Search terms: performance/incentive pay; teacher incentives; performance-related pay; merit pay, bonus pay, loss aversion
Puntuación de la evidencia
There is one meta-analysis which was conducted in the last ten years on performance pay. Most of the research tends to be correlational or from matched groups, although some studies with stronger causal warrant have emerged from the USA over the last few years. In general, it is hard to make causal claims about the benefits of performance pay on the basis of existing evidence. Overall the evidence is rated as limited.
Información coste adicional
Sums of between $15,000 and $5,000 have been awarded in merit pay schemes in the US. In England, performance pay generally means schools using staff performance to allocate teacher progression within existing pay ranges. Some academies have paid one off performance bonuses of between £100 and £2000 per teacher (or between £4 and £80 per pupil across a class of 25). Overall, costs are low estimated as low.
1 - Atkinson, A., Burgess, S., Croxson, B., Gregg, P., Propper, C., Slater, H. & Wilson, D.
Labour Economics 16:3, pp 251-261
2 - Balch, R., & Springer, M. G.
Economics of Education Review, 44, 114-125
3 - Burgess, S., Croxson, B., Gregg, P. & Propper, C.
CMPO Working Paper Series No. 01/35
4 - Dolton, P. & Marcenaro-Gutierrez, O.
Economic Policy 26(65): 5-55
5 - Education Commission of the States
The Progress of Education Reform, 11(3)
6 - Fryer Jr, R. G., Levitt, S. D., List, J., and Sadoff, S.
NBER Working Paper. Cambridge, MA: NBER
7 - Fryer, R.G.
National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 16850
8 - Glazerman, S. & Seifullah, A.
Mathematica Policy Research, Inc./ IES
9 - Glazerman, S., Protik, A., Teh, B. R., Bruch, J., & Max, J.
Mathematica Policy Research, Inc./ IES
10 - Goldhaber, D., & Walch, J.
Economics of Education Review, 31(6), 1067-1083
11 - Lavy, V.
Journal of Political Economy, 110(6), 1286-1317
12 - Martins, P.S.
Centre for Globalization Research: Working Paper 29. Queen Mary, University of London
13 - Muralidharan, K. & Sundararaman, V.
Journal of Political Economy, 119(1), 39 - 77
14 - Podgursky, M. J., & Springer, M. G.
Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 26(4), 909
15 - Shifrer, D., Turley, R. L., & Heard, H.
American Educational Research Journal, 54(6), 1117-1153
16 - Springer, M. G., & Winters, M. A.
Civic Report No. 56. Manhattan Institute for Policy Research
17 - Springer, M. G., Pane, J. F., Le, V. N., McCaffrey, D. F., Burns, S. F., Hamilton, L. S., & Stecher, B.
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 34(4), 367-390
18 - Washington State Institute for Public Policy (Abstract)
19 - Wellington, A., Chiang, H., Hallgren, K., Speroni, C., Herrmann, M., Burkander, P & Warner, E.
NCEE 2016-4004. National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance. Washington: IES/US Department of Education
20 - Woessmann, L.
CESifo Working Paper No. 3151 Category 5: Economics Of Education Munich: CESifo
21 - Yuan, K., Le, V. N., McCaffrey, D. F., Marsh, J. A., Hamilton, L. S., Stecher, B. M., & Springer, M. G.
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 35(1), 3-22
Resumen de efectividad
18 - Washington State Institute for Public Policy (2015)
Teacher performance pay programs distribute bonuses to individual teachers and sometimes to school wide staff. Performance is usually measured as value-added student test scores alone or in combination with some other assessment (such as principal evaluations). These evaluations examine the impact on student test scores from short-term, pilot performance pay programs. 28 studies, impact on test scores 0.019.